Blog: Expanded Universe

content

♪ here comes the content / it's a beautiful day to stay inside ♫

Every few weeks I see somebody criticizing the word "content", generically referring to stuff people make online, and derivatives like "content creator". For, I think, commoditizing those creations, which should be more specifically referred to as art, text, videos, music, games, what have you; for subtly centering the consumer (or, worse, the advertiser) as the content's raison d'être, by way of implying that the content is there to "fill up" the consumer's feed, rather than centering the creator or the thing being made itself. I think?

And I kind of get it... if one of the more precise labels fits, then sure, it's probably good to use it. It feels bad to have your creations commoditized. But also...

I don't think of myself as a content creator, but I do make stuff and put it online sometimes, and personally I'm fine calling that stuff "content" because I don't know a better word that encompasses all of it. (Admittedly I don't actually refer to the stuff collectively in practice, so maybe I don't really have a point.) What word encompasses meandering blog posts, and strange mini-web-apps, and of course puzzles, and the occasional video, and the very occasional programming language?

If you think you have a better word, though, feel free to let me know.